PPEL - Unit 4: Final Report on Task 1

Unit 4 - Final Report...

Review of my three Annotated Bibliographies and presenting a Comprehensive Bibliography on the readings developed in this course.

Before I start to share my final work I would like to add some comments on the method I decided to use to present it.

To begin with, , the recent changes were written with the color brown, so the difference between what is now done and what was already done is more perceptible and I also chose to use the green and italics in the transcriptions, so that they may become more noticeable… the rest of the work remains unchanged. Further, I also found pertinent to place the number of pages of each reading in the case of the Annotated Bibliographies and the date in which the documents were consulted, so that this also becomes clearer. These considerations were taken in regard when reviewing all three units and the method was also re-used in all of them.

Regarding the feedback on Unit 3…it was suggested by both Professor Paulsen and by the colleague that reviewed it… that it would be good “to write a short introduction or conclusion that brings it all together” - I decide to write a conclusion. In addition, I also decided to make some changes namely regarding the illustration…I decided to replace it with the course of a small stream to establish a comparison between transparency and the transparency of the water, the borders of the stream and the limits that each one of us has to establish regarding the level of transparency and, finally, the interaction that transparency allows in online education and course of the water, which is shown with movement and dynamism.


I hope you will find my readings as valuable and as pertinent as I did… I wish you all a safe and good reading!!!

@@@@@@@@@@

In this last unit we are asked to improve and finalize all our annotated bibliographies and learning objects. Bearing in mind this request I will now start working on unit 1 and compile it, refine it and as it was also asked to expand it.

So, bearing in mind unit 4 - Task 1 here is my final work…


~~~~~~~~~((()))~~~~~~~~~

Unit 1 – Task 1: Cooperative Freedom

Therefore, for the first task of this unit an Annotated Bibliography was prepared and presented on my blog where all the readings were shown as well as the most important aspects of them.

Regarding the improvement I decided to do a revision on the presentation of my work, namely in distinguishing my personal reflections as well and the transcriptions of the authors of my readings. I also decided to add the number of pages that each referenced work has in order so that what it is required in our learning contract on “ find and read 100-200 pages of articles, blog entries etc, related to the topics discussed in this course” becomes more understandable.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVXtbLg5ycE

• Paulsen, M. F., 2008, Cooperative Online Education. Seminar.net, Vol. 4, No. 2. (20 pages)

(Research done on the 10th of March , taken from: http://seminar.net/index.php/volume-4-issue-2-2008-previousissuesmeny-124/100-cooperative-online-education )


A very “real” and up-to-date article, for it shows graphics regarding the popularity of cooperative online education among students as well as other resourceful illustrations on individual, cooperative and collaborative environments, namely regarding the question of flexibility and others. It starts by saying:

“Cooperative learning seeks to develop virtual learning environments that allow students to have optimal individual freedom within online learning communities”.

To introduce the topic it starts by doing a brief background information on cooperative online education and it refers to have been built under the scope of The Theory of Cooperative Freedom, by prof. Morten Flate Paulsen, who is also the author of the article in question. Bearing this in mind, Prof. Morten Flate Paulsen makes reference to NKI – as well as its graphics to corroborate his version -, one of his creations, that was:

“(...)developed to support cooperative freedom and transparency in a large-scale online education environment”

and that:

“(...) it facilitates individual freedom within a learning community in which online students serve as mutual resources without being depend on each other.”

According to the article thanks to NKI, in cooperative learning, individual flexibility and freedom is center of the question and in his theory the claims that there important flexibility facets to consider, such as time, space, pace, medium, access and content and students whether they decide to work alone or with “(online)learning partners” their success is granted.


• Theory of Cooperative Freedom, MortenFP . toonlet.com (1 page)

(Research done on the 9th of March , taken from:http://toonlet.com/archive?m=s&i=10870)

Theory of Cooperative Freedom
by MortenFP related [www.ednews.org]



A straightforward and “amusing” way of giving highlights – sort of a BD - on online education and the Theory of Cooperative Freedom. Its author Prof. Morten Flate Paulsen presents “a concentrated recipe” about this theory in a very concise and a joyful manner by offering the reader some of the main ideas described in the thinking of Cooperative Freedom. Through the existence of individual learning, collaborative learning and cooperative learning in online environments, students, either those who search an individual way of study or a collaborative one, or a cooperative way to achieve their aims and goals within their pace, time, content, space access and medium reach their academic success.



• Paulsen, M.F. 2003, Part One: Online Education, Teaching and Learning, Cooperative Freedom: An Online Education Theory, Education Online. (12 pages)

(Research done on the 9th of March, taken from: http://www.studymentor.com/cooperative_freedom.pdf )

A very interesting, concise and challenging article that gives us insights on The Theory Cooperative Freedom, by exposing right at the top that:

“ (...) the theory of cooperative freedom argues that online education can foster both freedom for the individual and group cooperation”.

At first, the article provides a sort of chronological information on Distance Education Theories, explores their content and shows some of the most preeminent writers for each theory, namely The Theories of autonomy and independence, by Moore, 1983; the Theories of Industrialization, by Peters, 1988; the Theories of Interaction and Communication, by Holmberg, 1988, and others up until nowadays with The Theory of Cooperative Freedom, by Prof. Morten Flate Paulsen.

According to this more recent perspective this theory presents a solution for the tension existing between the notion of individual independence and collective cooperation that in most cases stresses students as well as their academic work. The theory depicts a scenario in which online education can give the individual freedom and the group cooperation needed, by offering the right dimension of space, pace, medium, access and content within its contexts for student to achieve individually, or in a collaborative and in a cooperative way his achievement academically.
Although at first sight finding the right way to study may seem difficult to conceive and achieve for we know that while some students seek individual flexibility and freedom, others the group collaboration and social unity, this study concludes that with online education we can have the both options working side-by-side in a cooperative and flexible environment.


• Paulsen, Morten Flate et Slaatto, Torhild, 2006, NKI in Learning Partner - Opportunities for Cooperation in Distance Learning, elearningeuropa.info. (4 pages)

(Reseach done on the 10th of March, taken from http://www.elearningeuropa.info/directory/index.php?page=doc&doc_id=8294&doclng=6)

“NKI Distance Education facilitates individual freedom within a learning community in which online students serve as mutual resources without being dependent on each other."

A brief article on what is NKI’s premise and on what it has to offer to online learning communities. NKI’s philosophy is based on the Theory of Cooperative Freedom by Prof. Morten Flate Paulsen.

NKI is innovative and through it individual freedom within the learning community is facilitated for with it online students voluntary may study wherever they are, they can also become mutual resources without being dependent on each other and it also offers them the possibility to start a course at any time of the year and always be able to follow their study progression.

According to the theory, there are six facets of flexibility of high importance – time, space, medium, access and content. In order to have a worldwide cooperative learning environment online, NKI invites all students to enter a personal presentation and in the future they may become “learning partners” and help those who are feeling unmotivated and unsatisfied with the progress of their studies by working in a cooperative (online) perspective, for there are others that prefer to continue their work individually. NKI’s main goal is students’ satisfaction on online education environments.


• Millis, Barbara J.,2oo2, Enhancing Learning - and More! - Through Cooperative Learning, theideacenter.org., IDEA PAPER #38 (10 pages)

(Research done on the 10th of March, taken from http://www.theideacenter.org/sites/default/files/IDEA_Paper_38.pdf )

An overview of cooperative learning divided in subtitles. It gives brief explanations on several pertinent issues regarding cooperative learning, namely the premises underlying it, which are three; the first one deals with the respect for students:

“(...)regardless of their ethnic, intellectual, educational, or social background”

and it has a strong belief in students potential and academic success; the second one illustrates the strong sense of community:

“(...) for learning, like living, is inherently social”

and it helps students to enlarge and improve their relationships; the third one is based on the notion that:

“ (...) learning is an active, constructive progress”.

The article delves into several interesting subtitles for it explains what is cooperative learning, its effectiveness, the motivation implicit on it and so on. In conclusion, cooperative learning is seen as an essential part of online education because it satisfies, for students, a human desire for connection and cooperation. Besides that it gives the opportunity to deal and to handle complex tasks very difficult to solve alone. Remember we are social human beings and therefore the sense of a learning community helps us/students to enhance the social and communication capacity needed to succeed in a (future) career.


• Tips on Cooperative Leaning

(Research done on the 10th of March, taken from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LWE2HF1v1Y )

A sort of casual encounter between colleagues gives room for a talk on tips for cooperative learning for it suggests good strategies for teachers to work with students. There are several suggestions very easy to put into practise, bearing always in mind, students interest, motivation and cooperative group work input. The presentation starts from scratch, that is, it explains how to start cooperative group - pair work - and goes to bigger groups. It is a very concise way of highlighting this tipe of learning in "presential" classes.

Unit 2 - Task 1: Online Teaching Techniques

Paulsen, M. F., The Online Report on Pedagogical Techniques for Computer-Mediated Communication. (76 Pages)


(An updated version of the report is available in: Paulsen, M.F., Online Education and Learning Management Systems: Global E-learning in a Scandinavian Perspective [www.studymentor.com])


(Research done on the 4th of April, taken from: http://www.nettskolen.com/forskning/19/cmcped.html)


A very challenging and interesting report that puts in evidence pedagogical techniques on computer-mediated communication and it also presents an overview about them. This report, according to the author, Prof. Morten Flate Paulsen, was presented in Birmingham, England in June 26-30, 1995 at a conference conducted by the International Council for Distance Education. Bearing in mind the author’s work, the report starts by making reference to one of my favorite techniques – brainstorming. By brainstorming we understand “creation of a pool of ideas” on a specific topic and this approach helps the “class” to “break the ice” by introducing a topic which will make the group think in a creative way and expand their thoughts upon the ideas of the elements of the “class”. In this case specifically, Prof. Paulsen used this technique to lead the participants to share experiences in pedagogical techniques that have been applied in CMC.

According to Prof. Paulsen a pedagogical technique is a way of achieving teaching objectives. Throughout the report, he author also points out in a very clear and objective way that there are four pedagogical techniques: one-alone techniques, one-to-one techniques, one-to-many techniques and many-to-many techniques. Once he states them, he describes them and specifies each one bearing in mind the approaches to be used.

In this online report, Prof. Paulsen also makes reference to other books and their authors as well as their contributions for the topic in question.

To sum up, balancing to the embracement of online education by some institutions – which I am sure to increase significantly in the future - , I feel this report is very enlightening and it can also be a good resource for further researches.



Kim, Kyong-Jee and Bonk, Curtis J., 2006, The Future of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: The Survey Says… - A survey substantiates some ideas about online learning and refutes others, Vol. 29, Number 4, Educause Quarterly. (16 pages)

(Research done on the 5th of April, taken from: http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/TheFutureofOnlineTeachingandLe/157426)


An interesting and well illustrated survey based on a study conducted by a group of individuals that believed to have relevant experience and insights regarding the present and future conditions of online education. This survey was also built as a way to understand and to bring insights to the use of technology in teaching, within both higher education and corporate training settings. This survey takes place from late November 2003 to early January 2004 and it shows several demographics of online instructors to portray a significant perspective of online teaching, its growth, its expected quality, its pedagogical techniques and it also presents predictions on to measure the quality of online teaching in the future. A good overview of the future of teaching in online environments.


Salter, G. and Hansen, S., Modelling New Skills For Online Teaching, Department of Computing and Information Systems, University of Western Sydney. (16 Pages)

(Reseach done on the 5th of April, taken from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane99/papers/salterhansen.pdf )

The content of this article is easy to grasp and it draws our attention to the need and (continuous) search for modeling new skills for online teaching. The authors make reference to the advantages of online material and describe the included methods for teaching online: asynchronous computer mediated communication, synchronous computer mediated communication, online assessment, learning resources, documents, multimedia, links to external resources and student prepared material.

The article also puts into evidence the new role of the teacher, which is now a facilitator instead of an expert authority (old perspective).

Another aspect that is also highlighted is the importance of the real and constant need to evolve because “as technology is evolving so rapidly (…) new teaching possibilities arise regularly” and we must be prepared for that.

I found this article very lighthearted and interesting for it deals with the urgency to monitor and update teaching strategies in order to teach successfully in an online environment.

Bawden, David. Robynson, Lyn et al., 2007, Curriculum 2.0? Changes In Information Science Education for a Web 2.0 World in Digital Information and Heritage, INFuture 2007. (13 Pages)

(Research done on the 6th of April, taken from: http://infoz.ffzg.hr/INFuture/2007/pdf/1-03%20Bawden%20et%20al,%20Curriculum%202.0.pdf)


Web 2.0 is depicted as an essential facilitator of online teaching for it:

“provides both the content of learning, and the tools to promote learning itself.” (p. 39)

In my opinion this study provides a significant glimpse of how Web 2.0 can be used and its implications in five countries, for they are the countries of origin of its authors – England, Australia, Ireland, Lithuania and Slovenija. A very interesting work!

“…the use of Web 2.0 facilities by academic staff themselves, for their own purposes, will enhance their understanding, and hence promote more credible teaching.” (p.40)

Shihab, Mahmud, 2008, Web 2.0 Tools Improve Teaching and Collaboration in English Language Classes, Presented at the National Educational Computing Conference 2008, San Antonio, TX. (21 Pages)


(Research done on the 5th April, taken from: http://staging.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Research/NECC_Research_Paper_Archives/NECC2008/Shihab.pdf)


A very challenging and stick to the point approach on Web 2.0 taking into account its huge role in online teaching and more precisely in English Language Classes.

“Web 2.0 tools, namely blogs, wikis, podcasts, and RSS were introduced to change teaching practices of in-service high school teachers to improve the collaboration of today’s students in the English language classroom.” (p.1)

This text deals with an experience in which changes in teaching practices, interviews, and other resourceful strategies were put into practice to study the best method in order to put into evidence the effectiveness of the learning process. In my opinion, this article depicts an idea of the impact and potential that Web 2.0 has and will have in online teaching and I found its reading very representative and enlightening.

Unit 3 - Task 1: Transparency in Online Education

“What we REALLY need is the pertinent information to the situation AND to get to know each other."

in Missing the Point: Transparency without Authenticity. (http://allenjfuller.com/2010/02/missing-the-point-transparency-without-authenticity/

• Paulsen, Morten Flate et Dalsgaard, Christian. Transparency in Cooperative Online Education. June 2009. (12 Pages)

(Research done on the 3rd of May, taken from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/rt/printerFriendly/671/1267)

This is a very interesting and pertinent article when dealing with transparency in online teaching education for it is about the impact and the pedagogical potential that social networking has as a facilitator of transparency and awareness among students. Bearing in mind that the aim of transparency is:

“to enable students and teachers to see and follow the work of fellow students and teachers within a learning environment and in that sense to make participants available to each other as resources for their learning activities”

it is quite understandable why, according to its authors, it has such a vital role in social networking. The authors throughout the article point out the importance of “being able to see and to be seen” because it is very significant that in an online teaching environment where cooperation is the basis of it that the information that students give about themselves and their work is as transparent as possible for eventual future sharing situations. Bearing in mind the term cooperative, the authors distinguish the existence of three types of learning, being the last one their choice of election:

- Individual learning, which as the name indicates is conducted alone with no interaction of a learning community;

- Collaborative learning, which happens in face-to-face meetings and online education and that requires the input of a group and consequently limits the individual;

- Cooperative learning, which seeks to foster some of the benefits of individual freedom and the benefits of cooperation in online learning communities and that takes place in networks.

Nevertheless being as authentic as possible also raises other controversial questions which are also dealt the level of authenticity and of privacy. Regarding these two questions the authors create a “Transparency Barometer” to analyze them and later in the part dedicated to Cooperative Student Catalogues they point out what they consider essential to be authentic in order to facilitate cooperation:

“e-mail address, telephone numbers, chatting identities, information regarding geographical location (e.g. zip-codes) for eventual face-to-face meetings and progress plan information so that students can identify peers who are working with in the same study unit.”

But even for these elements the authors also call attention that this private information must be handled carefully and an authorization to make them public is always needed.

In my opinion, the choice of this article is very important for it cleared my mind regarding transparency in online teaching education. I found it also enriching to see how the two authors dealt with the question of authenticity, its impact in the course’s development and in teachers and students’ interactions during the studies.


• Bowles, Michelle. 5 Twitter Tips for Staying Authentic and Transparent. 2009 (28th September) (7 Pages)

(Research done on the 3rd of May, taken from: http://www.toprankblog.com/2009/09/twitter-tips-authentic-transparent/)

In 5 Twitter Tips for Staying Authentic and Transparent, Michelle Bowles presents in a very straightforward way five tips on how to be authentic and transparent, which I will start to explain:

1. The first one deals with the placing of a photo and a name for this helps to establish connections with the ones that look at our work or that wish to interact with us, for in fact:

“Putting a face and a name behind your Tweets through a photo and brief bio can help followers relate to and connect with your brand.”

2. The second one is regarding personality and it is in favor of showing that in fact we are “real individuals” with feelings and humor for:

“It doesn’t have to be all business all the time. Have some fun with your Tweets by telling humorous stories or poking a little fun at yourself now and then.”

3. Regarding the third one it is important that you admit when you are wrong, not only because with mistakes we learn, but also because it is part of our nature and people make mistakes and they must also know how to cope with them.

4. On the fourth one, it deals with “Get to know your followers” it is important to be known but it is also important to know who you are dealing with, so this fourth tip is about asking questions simple questions about themselves, such as name, age, interests (nothing too personal).

5. The last one is “Don’t get carried away by your accomplishments” and the tip is that you should not let your success get to your head for it were your followers that gave it to you and that have largely contributed for it. So remember…be modest!

I found this text interesting, easy to read and with good tips regarding our present in Online Teaching Education and one of the sentences that exemplifies what is presented is “Be authentic and transparent in all you do.”

• Hill, Christopher. Principles for improving Online Transparency. 2008 (1st April). (4 Pages)

(Research done on the 4th of May , taken from: http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/distance-learning/principles-for-improving-online-transparency-quality/)

The reading of this article gives emphasis to the idea that a “well-informed student or prospective student – benefits everyone.” In addition, this article depicts the theory that everybody, universities and colleagues only have to gain with transparency and to defend this thought three principles are mentioned and explained for the institutions that seek and want transparency.

1. Make distance education a central element of your mission – if you are dealing in fact with distance learning make sure that you are ready for it and be prepared, so that your students may have access to all resources online in order to carry out a good quality program;

2. Accountability to stakeholders – deals with giving adequate information to students about the content of the course-study, who teaches it and who is present for future questions that any prospective students may have related to the course itself;

3. Responsiveness – means that an educational institution must be prepared to respond quickly to an online-student so that he may have feedback as soon as possible within 24 to 48 hours;

I feel this article points out several aspects that need to be taken into account when we are confronted with the problem of being and of creating transparency in online teaching. According to Michael Offerman, president of Capella University:

“To meet the education needs of adult students, we must provide them with trustworthy and transparent ways to choose among many available options and to gauge the potential of each one to further their careers. The goal of the program is to lead universities and colleges toward greater accountability and transparency.”

• Dalsgaard, Christian. Social Networking Sites: Transparency in Online Education. (11 pages)

(Research done on the 3rd of May, taken from: http://content.yutu.com/Library/A1mvrs/TransparencyinOnline/resources/32.htm)

An excellent approach on the pedagogical potentials of networking sites bearing in mind the fact that these sites are a combination of personalization and socialization regarding those that in a transparent way truly take part in them. According to this study when students take part in these networking sites and publish their thinking, aims, works and share it with others they are being transparent, that is they:

“have insight into each other’s work, thoughts, and productions.”

Taking into account this idea student’s personal information becomes known to others through the process of sharing in a larger scale – a social network – and in this sense the notion of a social group with similar interests and relations emerges. Through this scenario we can observe the immense potential of these “social networking sites”, which the author reveals as:

“a supplement to other tools” for according to him “the potential of social networking lies within transparency and the ability to create awareness between students – potentially across institutions and nations.”

This challenging and amazing reading delves into the impact of social networking sites and the transparency that they involve when dealing with online teaching.

• Paulsen, Morten Flate. Profiling Online Students. (2 Pages)

(Research done on the 4th of May, taken from: http://content.yutu.com/Library/A1mvrs/TransparencyinOnline/resources/43.htm)

This interesting article aims to the use of transparency in Online Teaching and describes one of the strategies used to develop this idea of transparency at NKI Distance Education and the impact they had in it.

In order to develop, promote transparency and future situations with it, a profile was created where students are given the choice to do their presentations and t publish them in an “open catalogue”, by clicking the “global visibility checkbox” in their profile. Later, when analyzed the impact of this measure, the following conclusions were achieved:

1. “… most presentations act as favorable homepages that focus on the students’ achievements.”

2. “The users are excellent ambassadors for NKI when they share their presentation with others. They provide a lot of relevant information for prospective students and key words for the search engines.”

3. “…the fact that so many serious, hard-working and successful students are willing to share achievements and experiences in an open, online catalogue is valuable for the field of online education.”

In my opinion this was truly an amazing finding to promote transparency among online teaching.

• Siemens, George. Teaching as Transparent Learning. (4 Pages)

(Research done on the 3rd of May, taken from: http://content.yutu.com/Library/A1mvrs/TransparencyinOnline/resources/55.htm)

“I’ve gained much from being a transparent learner.”

George Siemens, the author, describes his path, experiences and progress as a transparent learner. According to him transparency is an important and significant requisite in online teaching for “when we make our learning transparent, we become teachers” and “watching others learn is an act of learning” for as he clearly point out:

“When someone decides to share their thoughts and ideas in a transparent manner, they become a teacher to those who are observing. Social technology - such as Twitter, blogs, Facebook – opens the door to sharing the process of learning, not only the final product.”

I found this reading encouraging and appealing for it deals with the experience of a “transparent learner” and his personal sharing of it.

• Paulsen, Morten Flate. Transparency for Quality. Toonlet.
Transparency for Quality
by MortenFP related [www.seminar.net]

(Research done on the 4th of May, taken from: http://toonlet.com/creator/MortenFP)

This comic strip is a very clear and presents a very objective approach on the importance that transparency has in order to improve the quality of online teaching for if others see what we publish, incorrect information becomes easily detected, feedback on it is given and errors are corrected. Clear, concise and stick to the point!

• Paulsen, Morten Flate. Transparency for Cooperation. Toonlet.

Transparency for Cooperation
by MortenFP related [www.seminar.net]


(Research done on the 4th of May, taken from: http://toonlet.com/archive?i=11245)

This comic strip deals with matters related to the cooperation that the use of transparency promotes in online teaching. When students give personal and transparent information about themselves other students interact more and a sense of cooperation is established between them. Nevertheless, an essential point is also presented - students’ transparency is to be handled carefully regarding their privacy and in this way students themselves should be the ones to choose the level of transparency to be allowed.

• Welcome to my PLE! - A Personal Tour by a 7th Grade Science Student.
(Youtube Presentation)

(Research done on the 4th of May, taken from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEls3tq5wIY)


I choose this Youtube Presentation because I found it a good example of transparency. Although it was created by a young student, matters such as organization and transparency are very clear and were carefully dealt and are now presented in a very objective way. This “PLE” – Personal Learning Environment - is the culminate of a research and intense work on networking sites, for as the student clearly points out he “spent some time since the beginning of the school year learning how to find information online and how to pull it out together on a personal page”, which we can observe thanks to its publication.

=========@@@@@@@@@@@========

• Final considerations...

Bearing in mind my readings, I conclude that in attended classes cooperative learning provides for students’ interaction in heterogeneous groups for it is built with the purpose of offering a leaning support for the elements of the group. In online education, cooperative learning provides the encouragement of individual flexibility and the affinity of learning within an educational community (Prof. Morten Flate Paulsen, 2003).

Although these two perspectives may seem difficult to combine, for they lead us to a controversy, the truth is that cooperative learning in online learning environments emerges as the solution for it emphasizes the co-existence of students that enjoy individual work and its benefits and outcomes, and the others that prefer the benefits of collaborative learning, or a so called, a learning community.

“Future adult students will seek individual flexibility and freedom. At the same time, many need or prefer group collaboration and social unity. These aims are difficult to combine, but online education, when integrated with other media, can be the means of joining individual freedom and collective unity into a truly flexible, cooperative distance educational programs.”

(Prof. Morten Flate Paulsen, in Cooperative Freedom: an Online Theory Education, 2003)

The contribute of these readings is enormous because thanks to them I was able to perceive the importance and the significance that Transparency plays in Cooperative Learning…which is massive! All the resources played an essential role in achieving my understanding of it and they took a fundamental part in it.

Therefore, now that my opinion is truly formed, I am happy and proudly I say:

I have gained, I am gaining and I hope to continue to gain much from being a transparent learner!*

(*This last sentence was readapted from “I’ve gained much from being a transparent learner.” by George Siemens in Teaching as Transparent Learning.)